Compromise??? Why now? Why not before?

It is amusing to see the Wakf Board and Congress Party talking about a Compromise formula in Ayodhya. Till the judgement came (when they were almost sure that the Wakf Board will win the title suit by a 2:1 majority), they had steadfastly refused to compromise, and had eloquently spoken about the 'absolute supremacy of the judiciary' and the 'primacy of the constitution'. Now that the judgement has gone against them, there is a subverted attempt to whip up the pseudo secular intelligentia and politicians to raise the issue of compromise. There was no talk of compromise for 60 years, then why now when the judgement has been given?